ricdoug
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2008
- Messages
- 3,379
- Reaction score
- 15
Behringer ADI21 active DI/preamp…
I ordered a Behringer ADI21 from Guitar Center on 11/17/12 expecting a 2-3 week delivery as stated on their website. After 4 weeks I called to find out what happened to my order. The next day GC told me it had shipped. The following day I received an E-Mail telling me my order had been cancelled. I called again and GC said I could be put back on the list in my original order and expect shipment in March. I told them no thanks. This is the first time I’ve had poor service from GC after many successful past orders. I then ordered the ADI21 from Amazon, based on Uncle David’s recommendation. It arrived in a week.
Any musician who’s ever plugged into a P.A. system or amp, especially with a passive piezoelectric pickup, has observed less than ideal acoustic reproduction. Myself and many others use an L.R. Baggs Para Acoustic DI to remedy this situation. Although the PADI is well worth it’s $160 buck ticket, it’s out of the price range for some. For $38 bucks, less than a fourth of the price of the PADI, I ordered and received the ADI21.
The package was well constructed to protect the ADI21:
Initial visual and physical observations show the PADI to be more robust in construction in heft, feel and controls. The PADI is heavily constructed of metal and the ADI21 is heavy plastic. The potentiometers on the PADI are smoother and feel more precise. There is no notch filter on the ADI21, like the one on the PADI, but the ADI21 does have parametric EQ to set the midrange control. It’s pretty obvious from the color scheme that the ADI21 was built as a competitor to the PADI. The ADI21 has the addition of a built-in footswitch to go between direct and active signals:
Both the ADI21 and the PADI have ¼” inputs and outputs, along with a balanced XLR output. The PADI has the addition of an effects loop:
The battery holder of the PADI is more stout and feels like it will last longer than the battery holder on the ADI21:
I ordered a Behringer ADI21 from Guitar Center on 11/17/12 expecting a 2-3 week delivery as stated on their website. After 4 weeks I called to find out what happened to my order. The next day GC told me it had shipped. The following day I received an E-Mail telling me my order had been cancelled. I called again and GC said I could be put back on the list in my original order and expect shipment in March. I told them no thanks. This is the first time I’ve had poor service from GC after many successful past orders. I then ordered the ADI21 from Amazon, based on Uncle David’s recommendation. It arrived in a week.
Any musician who’s ever plugged into a P.A. system or amp, especially with a passive piezoelectric pickup, has observed less than ideal acoustic reproduction. Myself and many others use an L.R. Baggs Para Acoustic DI to remedy this situation. Although the PADI is well worth it’s $160 buck ticket, it’s out of the price range for some. For $38 bucks, less than a fourth of the price of the PADI, I ordered and received the ADI21.
The package was well constructed to protect the ADI21:
Initial visual and physical observations show the PADI to be more robust in construction in heft, feel and controls. The PADI is heavily constructed of metal and the ADI21 is heavy plastic. The potentiometers on the PADI are smoother and feel more precise. There is no notch filter on the ADI21, like the one on the PADI, but the ADI21 does have parametric EQ to set the midrange control. It’s pretty obvious from the color scheme that the ADI21 was built as a competitor to the PADI. The ADI21 has the addition of a built-in footswitch to go between direct and active signals:
Both the ADI21 and the PADI have ¼” inputs and outputs, along with a balanced XLR output. The PADI has the addition of an effects loop:
The battery holder of the PADI is more stout and feels like it will last longer than the battery holder on the ADI21: