stevepetergal
Well-known member
I'd offer 'em ten bucks.
I told her that if she would trust me to sell the guitar for her, she could have all the money except for 10% which I would take. She agreed. Two weeks later, I sold the guitar on eBay for over $3000 and handed her a check for almost that much.
Honestly? I think I'd tell the seller that their vintage Martin is worth much more than the $25 that they are asking. But I'd also explain how much I would love to have it, and give it a good home, but that I couldn't afford to pay full value. I would offer them what I could afford to pay, say $100 for the sake of this discussion. Then I would accept the seller's decision to either sell it to me, or not, at that price. Either way I would walk away feeling good about what I had done.
If the seller declined my offer of $100, I would be glad that they now knew the value of the instrument, and that they might get a better price for it.
If they accepted my offer of $100, I would feel good that I found a vintage Martin that I could afford, and know that I didn't take advantage of the seller.
Either way, for me it would come out a win/win....
I'd offer 'em ten bucks.
That's the way it works. I've even known people who have gotten MBUs for free!
I have a repair and building business and I am faced with this situation a couple times a week, mostly guitars, violins, etc. I always tell the customer what the instrument is, how much it is worth in today's market after all the repairs are made, (if it needs any), how much it is worth in its present condition, and what I would pay them now, if they are interested in selling. Most of the time people don't know what they have, good or bad. They deserve the truth whatever it is. I do the same when I am at a garage sale or they come by my shop. The golden rule applies IMO.
Years ago, I had a 91 year woman come into my shop with an old guitar. She said her dad bought it for her in 1937, she had the original receipt, and she played it for a few years then put it under the bed and it has been there ever since. She said she wanted $300 for it, but would take less if I thought it wasn't worth that much. I opened the original case and saw she had a beautiful sunburst Gibson L-00, 1936. It was practically in mint condition. It had no issues other then the strings were rusted. It sounded like a canon and played great.
Here was a situation where I could have made out like a bandit. I told her that if she would trust me to sell the guitar for her, she could have all the money except for 10% which I would take. She agreed. Two weeks later, I sold the guitar on eBay for over $3000 and handed her a check for almost that much. She was living on a fixed income, was over joyed and after she stopped crying, I had a nice long talk with her about her life and family. That is what it is all about IMO.
I see integrity and morals come up a lot in this discussion. Could someone please explain to me how buying this uke for $25 displays a lack of integrity or morals?
No one can because it isn't a lack of integrity or morals. It is an honest transaction,PERIOD. Idon't even see how anyone could argue that paying a posted price would show a lack of integrity or morals.
Now if someone said "Give me what you think it's worth" and then you said $25....that would be a lack of morals and integrity.