Nickie
Well-known member
I found out that supposedly, the luthier I want to talk to about having a uke made for me is out of aged wood, and is using "new" stuff. Another builder has wood as old as me (wow). I guess the newer wood that hasn't aged as long isn't as good? He said it took him a year to build three ukes, while building guitars and mandolins. The ukes are "neck heavy", which he said makes them louder. He used ash. I don't like a heavy neck. Wouldn't mahog be a better choice?
I also heard that some builders are using "kiln dried" (although it isn't called that anymore) wood, which has the water sucked slowly out of the cells, which doesn't sound too good. He said he has 3 "piles" of spruce for soundwood. One pile is "dead" when you thump it, one pile has a slight "ring" which dies rapidly, and another pile rings and sustains when thumped. I think I need to make the drive again and listen to it for myself.
And is it true that the thickness should be 1/32nd"?
Other than the heavy necks/thick headstocks, the ukes are quite lovely and feel good to hold and strum. No glue sticking left on any surfaces, no frets sticking out, it's quality work, I think. One is made of African blackwood (?) and is very dark and has a bright tone. One is made of red oak and white oak. I called it an "oakalele".
He told me that it might take him a year to build what I want, as long as he uses wood he already stocks, because he also does a lot of repairs for customers. The other luthier in the area has a year wait list for start dates....I think I'd be happy with either luthier, but one would cost me more. (I really don't need to pay for a fancy name)
But I would be able to drive over once in a while to see the progress, and would be able to personally pick out the wood pieces. I feel like a bit of a guinea pig, in a way, but with him knowing I'm not far away and know LOTS of ukers, he would probably try to do his best work. The repair work he has done for me has been excellent and pretty cheap.
Both ways would give me time to save up the money....
Any thoughts?
I also heard that some builders are using "kiln dried" (although it isn't called that anymore) wood, which has the water sucked slowly out of the cells, which doesn't sound too good. He said he has 3 "piles" of spruce for soundwood. One pile is "dead" when you thump it, one pile has a slight "ring" which dies rapidly, and another pile rings and sustains when thumped. I think I need to make the drive again and listen to it for myself.
And is it true that the thickness should be 1/32nd"?
Other than the heavy necks/thick headstocks, the ukes are quite lovely and feel good to hold and strum. No glue sticking left on any surfaces, no frets sticking out, it's quality work, I think. One is made of African blackwood (?) and is very dark and has a bright tone. One is made of red oak and white oak. I called it an "oakalele".
He told me that it might take him a year to build what I want, as long as he uses wood he already stocks, because he also does a lot of repairs for customers. The other luthier in the area has a year wait list for start dates....I think I'd be happy with either luthier, but one would cost me more. (I really don't need to pay for a fancy name)
But I would be able to drive over once in a while to see the progress, and would be able to personally pick out the wood pieces. I feel like a bit of a guinea pig, in a way, but with him knowing I'm not far away and know LOTS of ukers, he would probably try to do his best work. The repair work he has done for me has been excellent and pretty cheap.
Both ways would give me time to save up the money....
Any thoughts?
Last edited: