Another Recipe
Plan on spending at least $600 dollars. Not joking here or trying to be dismissive in any way. Or at a lower pricepoint Mele.
Frankly, my preference is this at this point: for less expensive, have quite a few quality laminates or not-all woods and play them well. Often in the end, these are the ones people love the best and play the most till they think their way to something "better." For solid wood, spend the bucks on 1 or maybe 2. In the end, you will spend more on the several "good" offerings when you add things up. The reply to this is, not necessarily from yourself:"I love my whatever BUT..." and then the happy ref. UAS. But out of respect for your question I think you are asking something different?
This is talking of course from a perspective of a defined sense of distinctiveness (handmade) vs. having 3-4 $200 ukes...which later serve as the starting point for wanting "the next level."
That's a good thought.
But here's another POV.
Sometimes it isn't much more cost to have an all solid wood that plays well than a laminate that plays well. For example, the Ohana Bell is a lovely uke, and well under 200 clams. Not much more than a nice laminate. Maybe $30 to $50 bucks. My SK21, $125; my PK 25--well, okay, that was $189, which is getting close to $200. Same with the Mainland.
So, this is my this trinity of uke buying:
Novelties: I play the heck out of them. My Dolphin(s) and Watermelon get a great deal of use.
Mid Range Ukes: Those just under $200 ones. I love them and play them everyday as well.
The Big Guns: Don't have one, only dream, and may never even buy one. But probably will, someday. In the meantime, I'm having a great time doing it this way.
Part of the fun of this for me is trying different instruments, seeing what they can do (or what I can do with them), and trading or purchasing another. I like it. It's fun.
I have art collector friends who do the same. They have a "closed" collection of 20 prints. If they want another, they have to sell to make room. Nothing wrong with that.
And yes, I could have had a Kamaka for the same price of all the ukes to date. But I'm not ready for a Kamaka.
Maybe later!
But back to the OP poster's question: I agree that a Mele might be a good choice. John knows about them. I've had my eye on their KOA soprano at $299. I don't have a Koa and I'm intrigued by the new design.