Tigeralum2001
Well-known member
I bought this http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=260554141041&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT
I examined the pictures thoroughly before bidding & read the description. All the while I was thinking of Elderly's definition (http://elderly.com/vintage/abbreviations.html) of used descriptions.
It arrived today with 2 long back cracks (5 & 6 1/2 inches long). No light shines through & based on the description they were likely repaired.
I would never think to use "excellent" to describe any instrument with cracks, repaired or not. Using Elderly's definitions, this would be a "good" condition instrument. I know buyer beware, etc., but all that being said I feel misled. Nowhere did the description talk about damage. In fact, it was worded to appear to be in better condition than shown.
I have contacted the seller, etc. What I was hoping for is some advice on conflict resolution. I am not opposed to keeping the uke, just opposed to the price. What would a fair price be? Any other productive thoughts? Thanks!
I examined the pictures thoroughly before bidding & read the description. All the while I was thinking of Elderly's definition (http://elderly.com/vintage/abbreviations.html) of used descriptions.
It arrived today with 2 long back cracks (5 & 6 1/2 inches long). No light shines through & based on the description they were likely repaired.
I would never think to use "excellent" to describe any instrument with cracks, repaired or not. Using Elderly's definitions, this would be a "good" condition instrument. I know buyer beware, etc., but all that being said I feel misled. Nowhere did the description talk about damage. In fact, it was worded to appear to be in better condition than shown.
I have contacted the seller, etc. What I was hoping for is some advice on conflict resolution. I am not opposed to keeping the uke, just opposed to the price. What would a fair price be? Any other productive thoughts? Thanks!
Last edited: