Rick Turner
Well-known member
Last week I wrote a message to the moderators of the UU outlining what I saw as being heavy-handed or somewhat misguided closings of a thread (Palm Wood) right on the heels of allowing a thread to develop which I found to be unfairly critical of one of our brethren luthiers, Joe Souza...and then having my thread re. that be closed down. I have not received any reply to the message I sent through what appear to be the proper channels...messaging to moderators through the "contact us" link. So...if any moderators are indeed out there, do you actually check incoming messages, or do we type in vain? How might we enter into friendly, yet critical dialog regarding some of us having issues with how you (moderators) are doing or not doing your jobs?
The Internet can put folks like us builders in a really tough spot sometimes. The customer is NOT always right, yet his or her uninformed criticism on public forums can do great harm, intentional or not, to luthiers. Too often I see uke buyers coming first to a forum with a problem that could be easily dealt with one-on-one with a builder or manufacturer. This is not the best way to deal with things, and I believe that in the long run, it does more harm to all parties than good.
And then there's the shutting down of a thread for absolutely no apparent reason...the Palm Wood thread. Sure, there were a couple of puns that cropped up, but absolutely nothing off-color, NSFW, or even mildly offensive to anyone. Was there a really bad post that got eliminated and then the thread closed? If that's the case, we participants deserve to know what happened, even if our tender eyes are protected by censorship.
It's issues like these that make me less and less interested in participating in this or any other on-line forums. To me, it represents a dumbing down, a race to the lowest common denominator that is itself offensive and off-putting. There is already a loud crowd of non-experts ready, willing, and able to tell people the worst way to fix broken ukes, to choose woods, what other materials to use, etc. I would think that the moderators of forums like this would bend over backwards to have real experts, be they historians, players, teachers, or luthiers participating fully and enthusiastically on-line.
Are there any moderators out there who would care to discuss these issues? And why no response? And I wonder if this will get locked...
The Internet can put folks like us builders in a really tough spot sometimes. The customer is NOT always right, yet his or her uninformed criticism on public forums can do great harm, intentional or not, to luthiers. Too often I see uke buyers coming first to a forum with a problem that could be easily dealt with one-on-one with a builder or manufacturer. This is not the best way to deal with things, and I believe that in the long run, it does more harm to all parties than good.
And then there's the shutting down of a thread for absolutely no apparent reason...the Palm Wood thread. Sure, there were a couple of puns that cropped up, but absolutely nothing off-color, NSFW, or even mildly offensive to anyone. Was there a really bad post that got eliminated and then the thread closed? If that's the case, we participants deserve to know what happened, even if our tender eyes are protected by censorship.
It's issues like these that make me less and less interested in participating in this or any other on-line forums. To me, it represents a dumbing down, a race to the lowest common denominator that is itself offensive and off-putting. There is already a loud crowd of non-experts ready, willing, and able to tell people the worst way to fix broken ukes, to choose woods, what other materials to use, etc. I would think that the moderators of forums like this would bend over backwards to have real experts, be they historians, players, teachers, or luthiers participating fully and enthusiastically on-line.
Are there any moderators out there who would care to discuss these issues? And why no response? And I wonder if this will get locked...