1st amendment & facts trumps any idea of a defamation lawsuit. This is not the brightest post I’ve seen on UUforum but did make me Lol.
While your statement is sort of true, many shady people will go to court to sue a person to inflict monetary loss and emotional stress even though the statements made are true. Especially since most people cannot afford to pay lawyers for a protracted and often delayed civil case.
A good lawyer can present the "facts" in such a way so as to cast doubt on whether they apply to the plaintiff and his business practices in the manner as stated by the defendant.
Plus, the fact that the person who made the statement (defendant) is being sued by the subject of the statement (plaintiff) is taken by much of the public to be an obvious sign of the innocence of the person claiming to have been defamed or slandered.
You can use weasel words such as "I heard...", "Several people told me...", "Everybody knows...", etc. But that won't always cover your butt. Particularly if the people you said it to can't remember the
exact words and phrases you used.
Just
don't accuse anyone of being underhanded, a cheat, a crook, a con artist, fraud, to have done anything illegal, etc. Even if you have first-hand experience or knowledge of the event. I know I couldn't afford paying a lawyer prepare a defense, show up for a court date only to have it delayed several times, and finally held, but no damages awarded. The American judicial system is a very expensive proposition for most people. And while Facts, and the First Amendment will ultimately win out if you have deep enough pockets, people usually settle out of court even though they are in the right.
Like it or not, the US, all to often, follows the "Golden Rule." IE: He who has the most gold—wins!
I am not a lawyer, nor am I giving legal advice. Just stating some "facts" that I have seen and experienced in one fashion or another, or read about. So take what I have said with a grain of salt.