Scale Length

i don't see the problem with varied scale lengths as long as the frets are cut according to the calculator. there surely must be flexibility in each string set to use on a slightly longer or shorter scale.
in my case it's a home build with hand cut fret grooves so the time to lay out and cut is the same regardless.

70sSanO said:

This may be better directed to luthiers.

I'm not talking about the standard ukulele scales of 13-1/2" soprano, 15" concert, and 17" tenor.

But I've wondered if the perfect ukulele design would lead to tweaks of the scales based on different woods and designs/bracing. For instance, instead of a 17" tenor, would 17-1/2" tenor allow design changes for a slightly larger soundboard and possibly improve the sound even more?

Click to expand...

The bigger the body's lower bout, the more potential for better tone/volume/sound etc.
A scale length is restricted to where the bridge falls on the lower bout (said again, the lower bout is restricted to where the scale length falls).

So yes,
1- a longer scale be appropriate for a larger top (bigger lower bout).
2- A longer scale has more tension to drive a bigger top,
3- bigger top has potential for more tone/volume

However,

4- you would need a bigger custom case due to the new body design.
5- why not just buy a baritone and capo at the 1st, 2nd or 3rd fret which would (then) have a similar fret distance as a normal 17" tenor.
6- or a parlour guitar

There are some traditionals i don't fight against, scale length (ie tenor is 17") is one of them