My wife and I liked our first Kanile'a Ukulele so much that we wanted to try their different sizes and finish options. By now, we have a Premium Concert with their UV Gloss finish, a plain Tenor with a Satin finish, and a Premium Baritone with what they call UV Silk finish. We bought them from different places and have no relation to the company whatsoever.
Here are some things we notice when comparing them to each other and to other makers. Of course, our thoughts are strictly subjective, and they rely only upon the specific instruments we own. Nevertheless, I hope this will be helpful to people who want to find out more about their different options.
Playability
One of the first things to notice is that Kanile'a Ukes are very light. In fact, they are the lightest we own in each size (Concert 480 gr, Tenor 560 gr, Baritone 670 gr). This might have to do with their own T.R.U. bracing system that has holes drilled through the braces.
Another thing that is pretty noticeable is that the neck/fretboard on a Kanile'a is wider than on most other Ukes (38 mm instead of 35 mm). This makes it easier to fret certain chords cleanly, especially on the smaller sizes. On the other hand, the wider neck sometimes hurts at the heel of my index finger, but that might as well be due to poor technique on my part. Still, I don't have this issue with Ukes that have a more rounded neck profile.
Their Gloss finish, I assume, might be what some consider sticky when sliding up and down the neck, but that is nothing I'm concerned with.
Looks
Kanile'a has arguably some of the nicest Koa that you'll see from a production line. If looks are important to you, then it may be worth investing in their Premium wood upgrade. However, I've seen a lot of nice figures on their plain entry level Ukes as well. My Tenor, for instance, has less curls, but a nice chocolate color with dark vertical stripes. In addition to this, I really like the fact that the guys at Kanile'a try to match the front and back, which isn't always the case with other makers.
Another feature that distinguishes Kanile'a from other competitors is their finish. They offer several different options, of which some have been discontinued and others changed, so I'm not sure if my following description is still valid in all cases.
Their UV Gloss is perfectly flat and mirror-clear, like a sheet of glass. Not sure if it is thicker than others, but definitely nicer than the somewhat porous finishes you see on other brands. Unfortunately, our Concert has some very bad scratches, or rather imprinted lines, in the finish on the back, perhaps from holding it against a buttoned shirt? Never read about others having this problem, so it might just be the one we got.
The Satin finish almost feels like no finish at all. It looks and feels very woody. The finish on my Tenor is oil based, I think, but from what I read, they might have changed to UV curing, too.
The third and last finish option that I have tried is called UV Silk. From what I've been told, this finish is the same as their UV Gloss, but sanded in a different way. Unlike their Gloss, it looks kind of milky from certain angles. Every single finger print shows, and it's almost impossible to rub them off with a towel, they just smear.
Kanile'a offers a wide range of models with added bling, but the three Ukes we have are all from their basic K1 line, as we like the plain look and don't expect the more adorned models to sound any better.
Kanile'a Ukes have a rounded back that is quite noticeable when comparing to other brands. Their body shapes vary from size to size: The Concert features kind of a Dreadnought pear shape, the Tenor is flat at the bottom, and the Baritone has a more rounded lower bout. All of them have 14 frets to the body, which is somewhat unusual for the smaller sizes.
Unlike most other Ukes, Kanileas have an additional marker at the third fret. Also, their Baritones and Guitaleles have a marker at the ninth instead of the tenth fret. Perhaps this is supposed to ease the transition from or to the Guitar world.
As much as I like their overall design, I'm turned off by the cheap plastic tuner buttons and bridge pins. At the price you pay for a Kanile'a, I'd be expecting some nicer materials.
Sound
I'm not a fan of the Aquila strings that Kanile'a puts on their Ukes, so I usually change them. Unfortunately, intonation was pretty poor with some brands of strings, which is awkward, since I use the very same sets on other Ukes with no such problems. Is it possible that Kanile'a is building to specs that work almost exclusively with Aquila strings? Really, I have never noticed such a dramatic difference when changing strings on other Ukes.
Apart from that, I like the sound, especially for strumming. I tend to believe that the different finishes do affect the tone: While the Satin sounds very open and "woody", the Gloss seems to be more compressed and focused, but sweet and with a bell-like ring. I assume the curved back helps with projection.
Summarizing thoughts
I like the fact that Kanile'a is coming up with fresh ideas like their own bracing system, different models and new finish options. I see room to improve with their plastic buttons and pins as well as with their choice of strings. What sets them apart from other competitors are their nice woods, some specific design features and, most noticeably, their lightweight.
If I were to chose just one, it would probably be a Concert. I like their Tenor, but a good Concert is harder to find, and I really like the features of the Kanile'a, with that Dreadnought shape, geared tuners, and 14 frets to the body. As for the finish: Despite the fact that ours got dings all over the back, I think I would pick Gloss, because it's very smooth and really stands out against the finish you see on other brands in the same league.
Again, these are my own personal thoughts about these instruments. I bet others have had different impressions and experiences. Would be interesting to hear them...
Here are some things we notice when comparing them to each other and to other makers. Of course, our thoughts are strictly subjective, and they rely only upon the specific instruments we own. Nevertheless, I hope this will be helpful to people who want to find out more about their different options.
Playability
One of the first things to notice is that Kanile'a Ukes are very light. In fact, they are the lightest we own in each size (Concert 480 gr, Tenor 560 gr, Baritone 670 gr). This might have to do with their own T.R.U. bracing system that has holes drilled through the braces.
Another thing that is pretty noticeable is that the neck/fretboard on a Kanile'a is wider than on most other Ukes (38 mm instead of 35 mm). This makes it easier to fret certain chords cleanly, especially on the smaller sizes. On the other hand, the wider neck sometimes hurts at the heel of my index finger, but that might as well be due to poor technique on my part. Still, I don't have this issue with Ukes that have a more rounded neck profile.
Their Gloss finish, I assume, might be what some consider sticky when sliding up and down the neck, but that is nothing I'm concerned with.
Looks
Kanile'a has arguably some of the nicest Koa that you'll see from a production line. If looks are important to you, then it may be worth investing in their Premium wood upgrade. However, I've seen a lot of nice figures on their plain entry level Ukes as well. My Tenor, for instance, has less curls, but a nice chocolate color with dark vertical stripes. In addition to this, I really like the fact that the guys at Kanile'a try to match the front and back, which isn't always the case with other makers.
Another feature that distinguishes Kanile'a from other competitors is their finish. They offer several different options, of which some have been discontinued and others changed, so I'm not sure if my following description is still valid in all cases.
Their UV Gloss is perfectly flat and mirror-clear, like a sheet of glass. Not sure if it is thicker than others, but definitely nicer than the somewhat porous finishes you see on other brands. Unfortunately, our Concert has some very bad scratches, or rather imprinted lines, in the finish on the back, perhaps from holding it against a buttoned shirt? Never read about others having this problem, so it might just be the one we got.
The Satin finish almost feels like no finish at all. It looks and feels very woody. The finish on my Tenor is oil based, I think, but from what I read, they might have changed to UV curing, too.
The third and last finish option that I have tried is called UV Silk. From what I've been told, this finish is the same as their UV Gloss, but sanded in a different way. Unlike their Gloss, it looks kind of milky from certain angles. Every single finger print shows, and it's almost impossible to rub them off with a towel, they just smear.
Kanile'a offers a wide range of models with added bling, but the three Ukes we have are all from their basic K1 line, as we like the plain look and don't expect the more adorned models to sound any better.
Kanile'a Ukes have a rounded back that is quite noticeable when comparing to other brands. Their body shapes vary from size to size: The Concert features kind of a Dreadnought pear shape, the Tenor is flat at the bottom, and the Baritone has a more rounded lower bout. All of them have 14 frets to the body, which is somewhat unusual for the smaller sizes.
Unlike most other Ukes, Kanileas have an additional marker at the third fret. Also, their Baritones and Guitaleles have a marker at the ninth instead of the tenth fret. Perhaps this is supposed to ease the transition from or to the Guitar world.
As much as I like their overall design, I'm turned off by the cheap plastic tuner buttons and bridge pins. At the price you pay for a Kanile'a, I'd be expecting some nicer materials.
Sound
I'm not a fan of the Aquila strings that Kanile'a puts on their Ukes, so I usually change them. Unfortunately, intonation was pretty poor with some brands of strings, which is awkward, since I use the very same sets on other Ukes with no such problems. Is it possible that Kanile'a is building to specs that work almost exclusively with Aquila strings? Really, I have never noticed such a dramatic difference when changing strings on other Ukes.
Apart from that, I like the sound, especially for strumming. I tend to believe that the different finishes do affect the tone: While the Satin sounds very open and "woody", the Gloss seems to be more compressed and focused, but sweet and with a bell-like ring. I assume the curved back helps with projection.
Summarizing thoughts
I like the fact that Kanile'a is coming up with fresh ideas like their own bracing system, different models and new finish options. I see room to improve with their plastic buttons and pins as well as with their choice of strings. What sets them apart from other competitors are their nice woods, some specific design features and, most noticeably, their lightweight.
If I were to chose just one, it would probably be a Concert. I like their Tenor, but a good Concert is harder to find, and I really like the features of the Kanile'a, with that Dreadnought shape, geared tuners, and 14 frets to the body. As for the finish: Despite the fact that ours got dings all over the back, I think I would pick Gloss, because it's very smooth and really stands out against the finish you see on other brands in the same league.
Again, these are my own personal thoughts about these instruments. I bet others have had different impressions and experiences. Would be interesting to hear them...
Last edited: