In another life I was part of management in a small family company that manufactured steel doors and frames. We had 2 unions in the shop. The painters were in the Machinists Union. Everybody else was an Ironworker. As "plant engineer" I had to keep them all on their proper tasks without doing any actual work myself. I was also the safety engineer so I had to keep OSHA and the insurance company happy.
Every three years the union contracts came up for renewal. The negotiation was always a set-piece drama. I was embarrassed to be management. The president of the company (my then uncle by marriage) would act as though every damned one of his employees was lucky to have a job; they should stand down and get back to work. All this as if he could make the product without them. Out of 35 plant employees there were only 3 who were considered unskilled trainees. We had skilled welders, metal workers (shears, punch presses, and press brakes capable of hundreds of pounds of pressure) painters &c. No way could the rest of us non-union employees, 9 in all, have made a single part for our product.
I understood that he was trying to limit costs, but who the hell did he think was going to build those doors.
The worker is not the enemy.
That's what I always say about teaching. The people who control the money in education (publishers; politicians) would like you to believe that everything wrong with education is the fault of the teacher. Sadly, there are enough morons in this world that believe the rhetoric. Eliminating the unnecessary upper level positions (the ones that make all the money in jobs created so they could have a job) would free up money to spend on #1 Teachers and #2 Facilities.
Raising teacher pay to a desirable level would cure many of the "bad teacher" rhetoric that exists because now there would be a natural competition for the job. Instead of the best and brightest blowing off a teaching career to pursue a more profitable calling, they would teach and there would be more competition for jobs and therefore the less capable teachers would be naturally forced out. It would also restore respect to the profession and make teaching desirable again. There are a whole list of things it would do to improve the education system but I've been on this soapbox before.
#2: for the past twenty years my school has been in a constant state of construction and remodel but we're an anomaly. There are schools all over the country that haven't experienced any type of modernization or repair in that same amount of time. Could you imagine having thousands of people in your home every day for twenty years and not spending any money for upkeep? That's what's happening in too many places in our country. I believe one of the reasons my school is ranked so high is because we spend the money on facilities and our school feels clean, safe and like an institute of learning. Hard to learn if most of your lights are broken, ceiling panels are missing and stained and the heat/AC is non-existent, water fountains don't work, toilets are gross etc.
So much to rant about.
::sigh::