Pete Howlett
Well-known member
I watched again the beautifully scripted and shot documentary on Greenfield guitars. He laminates his sides as some do here but not the backs. This makes absolutely no sense to me in terms of construction and conservation.
What I do know is my 1970's Yamaha FG150 was entirely laminated top, back and sides but its was an amazing instrument. However many laminated ukes sound very thin - the Romero (HMS documentary I think but cannot find it in the YT play list) one being a case in point with it's 'veneer braced' front. Loud but no character.
So I can understand conservation issues, see the value of the construction method in terms of stability and consistency. I just don't get how those layers of glue between the laminations which have been historically and actually despised for their sound dampening qualities can now be extolled with virtuous applause.
Am I being awkward about this (an it won't be the first time I and YOU know )or am I still in the Dark Ages?
What I do know is my 1970's Yamaha FG150 was entirely laminated top, back and sides but its was an amazing instrument. However many laminated ukes sound very thin - the Romero (HMS documentary I think but cannot find it in the YT play list) one being a case in point with it's 'veneer braced' front. Loud but no character.
So I can understand conservation issues, see the value of the construction method in terms of stability and consistency. I just don't get how those layers of glue between the laminations which have been historically and actually despised for their sound dampening qualities can now be extolled with virtuous applause.
Am I being awkward about this (an it won't be the first time I and YOU know )or am I still in the Dark Ages?