As mentioned by Kenn2018, I too found Mya-Moe’s video to be a great help the first time I restrung a slot head.
Do you have some link to that discussion? I just wonder how he defines a better sound? Sound is pretty subjective. .
I am just going to take your word for it.Disclaimer: I am not an expert but have seen and read enough to be dangerous :-( I would like some one who truly knows to chime in and either disagree or agree.
From what I understand the break angle helps avoid leakage of the vibration beyond the nut (when you pluck a string, does the string after the nut vibrate). The job of the nut is to send the vibration back down to the saddle... since the tuner rod is lower down the break angle is steeper.
This is also believed to be a marginal gain, most folks won't notice such a difference but I also believe, sum of all marginal gains makes a great ukulele.
That said, it also depends on the overall design of the uke, is the whole body participating, neck, head stock (I believe lighter builds do it) whereas heavier builds tend to isolate the vibration to the strings, saddle and top.. Also, slotted head stocks tend to lighter but I would guess it depends on the wood used for the neck.
In summary.. there might be a legitimate difference in sound for a given uke building technique between a slotted head stock vs regular. Check with the builder if he believes this.. there many luthiers who will upfront state that for them it is purely aesthetical.
I like the look—more consistent with other stringed instruments. Flat paddles to me look more like toys.
The tuners all tighten the strings in the same turning direction, and turning the pegs is more ergonomic, less awkward.
The break angle across the nut is increased—similar tonal advantages as at the saddle (though, as far as I can work out, this would only affect strings played open, and I don't see the sense of having them sound different from stopped strings—rather, that strikes me as a disadvantage).
The buttons point back, as with friction tuners, for a somewhat sleek look—at least, from the front. (I often hear people say they prefer friction tuners for this reason, ignoring that, to the player, friction tuner pegs actually "stick out" more than standard geared tuners. But maybe they're more concerned with the visual impression they make on others—or spend more time looking at their ukes than playing them.)
With a slotted headstock, an ornate logo or headstock design is unnecessary. I'm not a fan of the kind of glitz often added to paddle headstocks.
Tuners for slotted headstocks are usually joined by a plate, often embossed with a design reminiscent of filigree—dressy without lapsing into gaudy.
Slotted headstock tuners tend to be of good quality, and are always open-geared and adjustable (at least, I haven't yet encountered an exception). There's no way to adjust a sealed tuner or UPT, apart from tightening the button, if you can even do that. Of course, many open-geared standard tuners are adjustable, and it costs less to replace them, should the need arise.
If there is added weight (remember, the slots take away some mass that the thickness adds), the "imbalance" may not matter if you play routinely with a strap, as I do.
A heavier headstock is said to aid the sound in some way: resonance? tone? sustain? I forget.
A slotted headstock carries more cachet as far as general public perception, partly because you seldom see cheap ukes with them—they cost more to make.
I've seen some cool slot designs—more striking and stylish than varying the paddle shape. The beveled bottom of a slot also shows off a layered headstock more effectively.
Disclaimer: I am not an expert but have seen and read enough to be dangerous :-( I would like some one who truly knows to chime in and either disagree or agree.
From what I understand the break angle helps avoid leakage of the vibration beyond the nut (when you pluck a string, does the string after the nut vibrate). The job of the nut is to send the vibration back down to the saddle... since the tuner rod is lower down the break angle is steeper.
This is also believed to be a marginal gain, most folks won't notice such a difference but I also believe, sum of all marginal gains makes a great ukulele.
That said, it also depends on the overall design of the uke, is the whole body participating, neck, head stock (I believe lighter builds do it) whereas heavier builds tend to isolate the vibration to the strings, saddle and top.. Also, slotted head stocks tend to lighter but I would guess it depends on the wood used for the neck.
In summary.. there might be a legitimate difference in sound for a given uke building technique between a slotted head stock vs regular. Check with the builder if he believes this.. there many luthiers who will upfront state that for them it is purely aesthetical.
If you are a "change the string set" type, stay away from slotted headstocks -- much harder than conventional
I simply like the looks. I even bought a slothead neck to make a banjo uke.
Can't resist showing off the double headed and sloted Bass'nBari with violin and cello pegs. This set up was the only one where the pegs didn't get in each others way. Yes it is a two sided instrument Bass on the green side and Baritone on the purple side.
View attachment 114472Can't resist showing off the double headed and sloted Bass'nBari with violin and cello pegs. This set up was the only one where the pegs didn't get in each others way. Yes it is a two sided instrument Bass on the green side and Baritone on the purple side.
View attachment 114471