jimafornia
Active member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2014
- Messages
- 32
- Reaction score
- 0
My primary attraction to these ukes was sound, playability, and comfort. They just felt and sounded right. I'm a fingerpicker, not a strummer, so your mileage many vary.
Neo1022 wrote an excellent review of the solid/laminate model, and I would just like to compare my new solid mahogany model with the solid/laminate. I picked up the TT a couple of months ago when it was announced that the solid/laminate model was being discontinued. It immediately became my favorite uke. I snatched up the STC soon after for the same reason. I was primarily a fluorocarbon reentrant guy, but both ukes sounded so good low g, I couldn't bring myself to change them.
My main quarrel with the "affordable" STC was the closeness of the tuning pegs to the neck. I had trouble forming an E7 or augmented chord at the first fret without my hand hitting tuners. It was a pain, but something I could work around. The solid mahogany model has a thinner, flatter neck and that no longer is a problem. A nice improvement.
It's a beautiful instrument, but that's not why I got it, Comfort, playability, and sound. This was set up at HMS and it is a joy to play. The sound? Depends on what you want. What attracted me initially was how alive the sound was fingerpicking, it just jumped out of the sound hole. The mahogany top is a little warmer, more subdued than the spruce. I like it. It is still alive, just not quite as bright or as loud. I listened to sound samples and comparisons on youtube for weeks before deciding. I knew right away the spalted mango was too bright, but debated between the koa and mahogany. Many I am sure will prefer the spruce top; your sound is highly personal. One wood doesn't fit all, and few will have the opportunity to try them all in person.
I love this uke. Is it worth twice the price of the solid/laminate? I guess to me, yes, but let your pocketbook be your guide.
Neo1022 wrote an excellent review of the solid/laminate model, and I would just like to compare my new solid mahogany model with the solid/laminate. I picked up the TT a couple of months ago when it was announced that the solid/laminate model was being discontinued. It immediately became my favorite uke. I snatched up the STC soon after for the same reason. I was primarily a fluorocarbon reentrant guy, but both ukes sounded so good low g, I couldn't bring myself to change them.
My main quarrel with the "affordable" STC was the closeness of the tuning pegs to the neck. I had trouble forming an E7 or augmented chord at the first fret without my hand hitting tuners. It was a pain, but something I could work around. The solid mahogany model has a thinner, flatter neck and that no longer is a problem. A nice improvement.
It's a beautiful instrument, but that's not why I got it, Comfort, playability, and sound. This was set up at HMS and it is a joy to play. The sound? Depends on what you want. What attracted me initially was how alive the sound was fingerpicking, it just jumped out of the sound hole. The mahogany top is a little warmer, more subdued than the spruce. I like it. It is still alive, just not quite as bright or as loud. I listened to sound samples and comparisons on youtube for weeks before deciding. I knew right away the spalted mango was too bright, but debated between the koa and mahogany. Many I am sure will prefer the spruce top; your sound is highly personal. One wood doesn't fit all, and few will have the opportunity to try them all in person.
I love this uke. Is it worth twice the price of the solid/laminate? I guess to me, yes, but let your pocketbook be your guide.