OldePhart
Well-known member
Yep...this was exactly what I was trying to describe but you do a much better job of getting the point across.I find that if you actually 'cock' your thumb once you decide to throw a triplet in - ie like doing a finger gun shape - it will flow straight after your forefinger & hit the strings 'naturally' without extra wrist action, then you just bring your forefinger back up again to complete the stroke.
As for sounding like a waltz stroke - by itself it sort of does. The triplet is really only meaningful for the contrast it provides against the "straight strums." When practicing triplets avoid just doing triplet after triplet after triplet (it's not that you should never play triplets back to back, Formby did it a lot, it's that while you are learning you really need to establish the timing against the straight beats). Do a couple of straight strums (either down quarters or down up eighths) and then toss in a triplet - which should be three strums in exactly the same amount of time as the single down quarter or the down-up eighths.
BarefootGypsy does a good job of describing the effect in her post. If we take a typical measure in 4/4 time with down strums on the quarters, and threw in a triplet on the third beat, the result would be "dum, dum, did-el-ly, dum. If you were playing along to a metronome the dum, dum, did, and dum would fall on the metronome beats. Contrast this with a "straight" down, down, down-up, down strum where you're doing all straight time with three quarter notes and two eighths - i.e. "dum, dum, dum-de, dum". Again, all the "dums" are on the down beat with the metronome. So, the only difference between these two strums is in that third beat where where we divide it into three parts instead of two.
And now, I think I've typed "dum" enough times for one post.
John