PineappleOwner
New member
Had already sent an email. Learned via this forum it is best with this vendor to telephone.I agree. But my point is talk to the proprietor first before posting on the forum.
Had already sent an email. Learned via this forum it is best with this vendor to telephone.I agree. But my point is talk to the proprietor first before posting on the forum.
Fair comment, but the poster was sharing experience and folk could see that that experience didn’t include speaking to the proprietor first. Readers can make their own interpretations…
Is it fair to expect a placed order to be effectively and efficiently dealt with? I’d have thought so and particularly if extenuating circumstances are unknown.
Graham, thank you for correcting me. I stand corrected- my comment regarding moderators was harsh and insensitive, and not helpful at all . To the moderators, Please accept my apologies.A fair point, I suppose, but on the other hand reputations are much more easily destroyed than built; there needs to be a fair balance between supporting a reputation and the inverse. What are reasonable warmings of people not to deal with and just (justifiable) pointers towards ones that folk find reliably good? I bought a uke from a very well regarded dealer here in the UK and, IMHO, got ripped off. The instrument had several small issues which should have been picked up and sorted out by the shop. I spent several hours putting simple things right and really should have returned the instrument instead. Of course I could have been unlucky, and likely was, but these things leave a bitter taste and resentmen.
I‘ve never named the shop that gave me bad service and don’t think that I’d start a thread about their bad service - such things can too easily get out of hand or have unintended consequences. To some extent every purchase involves a degree of luck or rather chance, better dealers minimise the luck needed but even they might have have an off day. Of course sharing experience is good; but, having talked to people in retail, the situation is, shall we say, far from one sided …
In my opinion, when someone posts a gripe like this that threatens to harm the reputation, either intentionally or unintentionally, moderators could at least ask the one making the complaint, “have you contacted the proprietor of said business, first?”“but on the other hand reputations are much more easily destroyed than built; there needs to be a fair balance between supporting a reputation and the inverse” to quote Graham
I’m glad you got it taken care ofHaving already sent an email, it was helpful for me to read the thread and find out that with this particular vendor it is better to telephone with a concern/problem, than to just email.
I had a delightful conversation with Mike on the phone, and even ordered a uke from him. I believe the charge was in error, and have no misgivings about the received order. I thank those who's posts were informative to me. Also, it is my choice as to which vendors I may select, and there should be no problem with stating that.
In reading your first post here, I saw and still do not see any issue with it. I hope you do not feel any need to further defend yourself and realize that most of the other comments were supportive of you.Had already sent an email. Learned via this forum it is best with this vendor to telephone.
But that does not really excuse them. If they list an email in contacts, they should respond. If they list a phone number, they should answer it or return calls. Otherwise, they will get a whole bunch of Yelp and other reviews giving instant negative feedback.
You can say this is A solution, but it is incumbent on businesses to respond to the ways they publicize their contact info. Actual example: Koaloha will not respond to a question I have about one of their instruments that I own. Multiple calls and multiple emails later, they still won't respond. So I am entirely justified in complaining about this. (I am not actually complaining.) I made the phone calls and the multiple emails. Is it incumbent on me to go to Oahu?That said, I don't think Tom is wrong to observe that it's incumbent on any of us who's not hearing from a vendor in a timely manner, whether we're paying about it or not, to get on the phone. I find email getting less reliable by the minute, and at the end of the day, when you dial phone number, you know whether or not someone is at the other end of the conversation.
You can say this is A solution, but it is incumbent on businesses to respond to the ways they publicize their contact info.
So, based on this email, do you regret posting criticism on the forum without first contacting Mike?Having already sent an email, it was helpful for me to read the thread and find out that with this particular vendor it is better to telephone with a concern/problem, than to just email.
I had a delightful conversation with Mike on the phone, and even ordered a uke from him. I believe the charge was in error, and have no misgivings about the received order. I thank those who's posts were informative to me. Also, it is my choice as to which vendors I may select, and there should be no problem with stating that.
What's to regret? By posting on the forum, they learned that there may be mitigating circumstances that require a bit more patience and follow up. If a business doesn't want customers to expect a response from them via email within a reasonable business time frame (say a few days to a week on the outside), then just post a phone number with a "we'll get back to you when we can" kind of message on their site.So, based on this email, do you regret posting criticism on the forum without first contacting Mike?
Mike? Who is Mike? I thought it was Uke Republic? Does Uke Republic regret not contacting the OP?So, based on this email, do you regret posting criticism on the forum without first contacting Mike?